Why using AI to make more content may be the least interesting thing we can do with it

Mid-century style illustration showing a transition from ‘Content Generation’ to ‘Judgement & Meaning’. On the left, stacks of papers, a laptop, and a university building represent content production. On the right, an open book, a human profile with a question mark, a magnifying glass, and balance scales represent critical thinking, interpretation, and judgement. A soft arrow connects the two, suggesting a shift from producing content to making meaning.

Higher education is not short on content. It has lectures, readings, videos, activities, frameworks, rubrics, and resources in abundance. What it is increasingly short on is time, clarity, and space for deep thinking. Yet as generative AI becomes embedded across the sector, much of the attention remains fixed on accelerating the very thing we already … Continue reading Why using AI to make more content may be the least interesting thing we can do with it